Firm History Practice Areas News Resources Career Opportunities


NEWS

Business

[08/20] NY restaurant uses 1933 prices; Steaks: 90 cents
[08/13] Ohio man buys new truck with thousands of coins
[08/01] Clothing store opens bar in middle of sales floor
[08/22] Illinois community fights to save prison, jobs
[08/22] Some parents struggling with back-to-school buys

More...

Personal Injury

[08/19] NY state firefighters deliver 3 babies in transit
[08/19] Suit accuses restaurant of giving man big tapeworm
[08/19] Sailor, knocked from boat, rescued 12 hours later
[08/14] Calif. mom gives birth on front lawn by herself
[08/01] Boy, 4, tries to drive to grandma's house, crashes

More...

Real Estate

[08/15] General Shopping Brasil Posts 74.3% Increase in Gross Revenue in 2Q08 and 67.6% in 1H08. Adjusted EBITDA Rises 96.0% in 2Q08
[08/15] Cyrela Announces 56% of the Sales Speed of 2Q08 Launches and 60% Growth in 1H08 EBITDA
[08/15] Trump to buy McMahon's home, let him live there
[08/14] Florida's Existing Home, Condo Sales Improve in 2Q 2008 Compared to 1Q 2008
[08/14] Xinyuan Real Estate to Report Second Quarter 2008 Financial Results on September 2, 2008

More...

Labor

[08/26] Returning firefighters find own station ablaze
[08/15] Debate coaches lose cool, one pulls down his pants
[07/30] Doorman who won $5M, said he'd stay at job gets ax
[08/21] Mass. principal in pregnancy pact has new job
[08/05] Agriprocessors cited for child labor violations

More...

Case Summaries

Family Law

[08/22] In re A.C.
Order terminating parental rights is affirmed where: 1) the dependency court's noncompliance with section 372 standing alone does not violate the parent's due process rights; and 2) the error is subject to a harmless error standard.

[08/22] Iglesias v. Mukasey
Petition for review of BIA's denial of motion to reopen the case is denied where: 1) petitioner's allegation that BIA had ignored evidence put forth by petitioner regarding his marriage to an American citizen was an allegation of legal error subject to appellate review; but 2) petitioner did not provide clear and convincing evidence that his marriage was bona fide.

[08/21] US v. Carson
Sentence for conspiring to transport a minor across state lines for the purpose of unlawful sexual activity and interstate travel to engage in illicit sexual conduct is affirmed where, for purposes of applying a sentencing enhancement, the minor victim was properly determined to be in defendant's custody, care, or supervisorial control, despite argument that the victim's mother's presence gave her sole custody and control.

More...

Labor & Employment Law

[08/27] Local Joint Exec. Bd. of Las Vegas v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
Petition for review of an NLRB order dismissing union's complaints against hotel employers for unilaterally terminating dues-checkoff before bargaining to agreement or impasse is granted where: 1) although the NLRB was responsive to a prior mandate from the circuit court that it adopt a new rule, it did not properly apply the new rule it adopted; and 2) contrary to the NLRB's ruling, the union did not clearly and unmistakably waive any right of employees to claim dues-checkoff after the agreements expired.

[08/27] Kozisek v. Couty of Seward
In an employment discrimination and civil rights case, summary judgment for defendants-county and county board chairman is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case under the Americans with Disability Act; 2) for purposes of a First Amendment claim, plaintiff's speech was not protected, and regardless, he failed to show a connection between his speech and his termination; and 3) a due process claim failed.

[08/26] Duncan v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) decision granting reconsideration is annulled where the WCAB erred in holding that a sanction can be imposed against the Uninsured Employers Benefits Trust Fund (UEBTF), if its "failure to comply with the award of attorney's fees resulted from willful or bad faith actions".

More...

Tax Law

[08/26] Estate of Lisle v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
In a tax case in which the IRS sought payment of back taxes by decedents' estates, opinion of the Tax Court holding the estates liable for underpaid taxes and fraud penalties is vacated and remanded where: 1) a presumption of correctness applied to the findings of a Special Trial Judge; and 2) in this case there was insufficient contrary evidence produced to overcome those findings.

[08/26] US v. Leveto
Conviction for federal income tax fraud is affirmed where: 1) defendant had knowingly and voluntarily waived his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and, once properly waived, this right is no longer absolute; and 2) there was no reversible error in several rulings regarding a warrant and summons.

[08/22] US v. Easterday
A conviction for willful failure to pay over employee payroll taxes is affirmed where: 1) US v. Poll, 521 F.2d 329 (9th Cir. 1975), is no longer good law; 2) willfulness does not require the government to prove that a defendant had the ability to meet his tax obligations; 3) thus, the district court's refusal to give a Poll instruction to the jury and the instruction it did give on willfulness were proper; and 4) for similar reasons, the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to admit evidence proffered by defendant in order to show how and why he spent money owed to the IRS to pay other business expenses.

More...

Probate Trusts

[08/13] Estate of Thottam
In a mediation matter relating to distribution of assets to the three children of the deceased, judgment is reversed where: 1) there is nothing in Evidence Code section 1123(c) requiring that an express agreement in writing permitting disclosure be contained in a settlement agreement; 2) the court erred in reading a timing requirement into section 1123(c); 3) the mediation and facilitation confidentiality agreement satisfied the exception to mediation confidentiality under section 1123(c); and 4) there was sufficient evidence before the court to establish the preliminary fact that a chart created at the mediation was a settlement agreement for purposes of section 1123(c).

[08/01] Estate of Molino
In probate proceedings involving appellant's claims that he had valid assignments entitling him to a percentage of respondents' inheritance, summary judgment against appellant is affirmed where: 1) the 1997 agreements were not enforceable as they were void as against public policy; and 2) appellant could not rely on ratification or laches to enforce the agreements.

[07/16] Perrin v. Lee
In a probate proceeding, denial of plaintiffs' section 21320 safe harbor petition for a determination that their proposed petition to invalidate two trust amendments would not be a contest within the meaning of a no contest clause in a trust is reversed where: 1) the trust did not explicitly state that a contest to an amendment would violate the no contest clause; and 2) the no contest clause was not incorporated by reference into the amendments.

More...


News
© Monaghan P.C. - All rights reserved. disclaimer
This FirmSite® is designed and hosted by FindLaw®